This is a Knowledge Index.

A Knowledge Index maps a firm’s expertise as the questions it can answer in order to make it citable by AI. This one is ours: Delphic’s knowledge, question by question, with a clear line between what we share here and what you can learn by speaking with us.

New to Delphic? Read the full story first →

TRAILSCURATED PATHS THROUGH THE INDEX
I

How AI discovery works

10 ENTRIES

Nº 001 · EXPLAINER

How is AI changing discovery and evaluation for expert firms?

A generated answer can both surface sources and frame which firms merit attention before the buyer visits a website.

READ →

Nº 002 · FRAMEWORK

What does it mean when AI mentions, cites or recommends a firm?

A name, a citation, source placement and a recommendation are distinct observations; their combination reveals how AI credits the firm.

READ →

Nº 003 · EXPLAINER

Why does AI treat the same firm differently from one question to the next?

A firm can be evaluated strongly when named yet remain absent or subordinate when the buyer asks the underlying unbranded question.

READ →

Nº 004 · EXPLAINER

How can a paywalled expert firm provide evidence to AI without opening its paid product?

A paywall protects the product but cannot serve as its public evidence layer; the firm needs attributable proof outside the paid core.

READ →

Nº 006 · FRAMEWORK

What should a firm audit when AI does not cite an expert source?

Audit availability, answer fit, inspectable evidence and repeated selection separately before changing the source.

READ →

Nº 007 · FRAMEWORK

How much should an expert firm publish for AI without giving away what it sells?

Maximise useful non-sensitive evidence; move protected knowledge only when a measured question-market opportunity justifies the trade-off.

READ →

Nº 024 · FRAMEWORK

How much can an expert firm credibly improve how AI discovers and represents it?

Potential is the per-engine, evidence-bounded gap between current position and attainable movement on each measured outcome.

READ →

Nº 025 · EXPLAINER

What can an expert firm change about how AI represents its authority?

A firm cannot rewrite inherited associations on demand; it can improve the retrievable evidence available for a specific question.

READ →

Nº 026 · FRAMEWORK

Why can't one visibility score describe how AI positions a firm?

Discovery, discovery-market Authority, Brand evaluation and Competitive standing answer different commercial questions and cannot be blended.

READ →

Nº 027 · EXPLAINER

Why can't one AI answer establish a firm's position?

One answer is one variable observation; a defensible position comes from repeated evidence reported with uncertainty.

READ →
III

Working with Delphic

14 ENTRIES

Nº 013 · FRAMEWORK

Why can't an expert firm manage AI discovery and authority as effectively in-house?

Internal execution cannot generate an independent comparative field from the firm's own portfolio alone.

READ →

Nº 014 · FRAMEWORK

How is Delphic different from AEO, GEO and AIEO products and services?

AEO, GEO and AIEO approaches typically work from selected prompts and public surfaces; Delphic manages question markets derived from the firm's legitimate authority.

READ →

Nº 015 · FRAMEWORK

Why does an expert firm need to keep managing how AI represents it?

Standing observation across platform, competing-supply and client-market change turns only material movement into a managed decision.

READ →

Nº 016 · METHOD

What does Delphic actually do, end to end?

Each stage produces the evidence required to make the next decision - from private map through measured outcome and management.

READ →

Nº 017 · CAPABILITY

How does Delphic prove it works before a full engagement?

A bounded proof tests whether Delphic can define, measure, diagnose, treat and produce pre-agreed movement in a live question market.

READ →

Nº 018 · METHOD

How do I know whether my firm is being credited by AI?

A trustworthy baseline keeps four outcomes separate, measures each engine through repeated natural questions and states uncertainty.

READ →

Nº 019 · CAPABILITY

How can you tell why AI repeatedly credits another source?

A source-gap diagnosis separates changeable evidence gaps from structural advantages, uncertainty and run variation.

READ →

Nº 020 · CAPABILITY

How does Delphic map private expertise into public question markets?

We turn what a firm knows into the buyer-question markets it can credibly own.

READ →

Nº 021 · CAPABILITY

How is a Delphic engagement structured?

Proof, private map, selected-family work and rolling management expand only when evidence and client decisions justify more scope.

READ →

Nº 028 · CAPABILITY

How should a firm decide what to change after measuring its AI position?

The defensible treatment is the smallest testable change justified by the diagnosed gap, attainable potential and approved disclosure line.

READ →

Nº 029 · FRAMEWORK

How can a Knowledge Index reveal where an expert firm should expand next?

Joining demand, AI ownership, public supply, response and treatment evidence by question family reveals opportunities no signal can show alone.

READ →

Nº 032 · SOURCE RECORD

How does Delphic estimate query volume for a question family?

Delphic maintains a protected estimator that returns a dated, confidence-labelled query-volume estimate for one validated question family.

HELD · AVAILABLE IN ENGAGEMENT

READ →

Nº 033 · SOURCE RECORD

How does Delphic rank question-market opportunities?

Delphic maintains a protected system that turns mapped evidence into an ordered portfolio of opportunities, observations and deliberate holds.

HELD · AVAILABLE IN ENGAGEMENT

READ →

Nº 034 · SOURCE RECORD

How does Delphic predict which source change is most likely to move an AI position?

Delphic maintains a protected expected-effect system that identifies the smallest eligible source change worth testing against a measured gap.

HELD · AVAILABLE IN ENGAGEMENT

READ →

Find the questions your firm should own.

We identify where your expertise can credibly lead, measure who AI credits today, and show the clearest opportunity to improve your position without over-disclosing what clients pay for.